Showing posts with label Free Will. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Free Will. Show all posts

Wednesday, 18 November 2015


CRYING: an ESSENTIAL PROCESS? 


This blog post may seem a tad obvious, but you would be surprised how many individuals do not allow themselves to fully experience their emotions e.g. crying.



















Currently society dictates when, where and what is a suitable situation to cry about. The implicit social rule book of how to feel is utter madness e.g. men should cry less or it is a weak trait. 

Crying is commonly viewed as "too" emotional, erratic and unreliable, so people just suck it up, accept it quickly and carry on with work, life and stuff.... 




What happens when we don't cry enough? When we don't allow ourselves to feel enough? What happens when we just keep moving forward in this fast-paced world? What happens when we choose to bury any emotional weaknesses or uncontrollable feelings deep down in our subconscious  and just crack on?




IF crying is one toolset to process emotions, then it would be silly not to do so. The psychological process to form tears allows feelings to be appropriately channelled. The aim is to NEVER suppress your emotions in the unconscious mind, but allow them to surface for a period of time, consciously (even if it feels annoying  or uncomfortable).




It is common in the working world for people to inhibit tears to reduce their own personal emotional expression e.g. by distractions. This method is used to avoid addressing what it is (e.g. the emotions felt). 

When at work we don't say "I feel like crying" to our managers or our teachers; most choose to ride above the waves of emotions. Over time this can add a heavy load to the unconscious mind.  We cannot see it grow visually but may feel it intensify  like a ticking time bomb. 




So why do some people instinctively avoid crying? Why does society make us feel it (crying or expression of negative emotions) is generally a weak and unnecessary thing to do? 

Who are they to decide when a person should or should not openly feel their own subjective emotions? 




So how does the simple choice of not expressing emotions fully impact a person's mental health? 

Can it really be a significant risk factor towards depression, PTSD or some other mental challenge of the mind? YES! 




Avoidance (to cry or feel emotions honestly) is a quick & dirty route via the thalamus. Thus it is not fully processed through the hippocampus (conscious memory). Hard science argues that  avoidance is a high risk factor for poor mental health. 




So we understand the brain areas and the cognitive hypothesised models to help explain why crying is a key process.... but what about the wider meaning of it all? 

You all have the ability for a greater awareness, a higher level of autonomy  and implicit freedom. So do I choose to place my emotions in a mental box that starts to overflow? Or do I open it up, accept them as they are and then move forward? 




Sometimes even though we feel we should be aware of how to do something, it is not always so easy. So here are some tips that may help you let it all out.... 




When dealing with your own emotions, it may be best not to focus on "what is the most socially acceptable way to feel". 

Sometimes you may need to listen NOT to everyone else, but just to your "own" instincts of what may work for you. 





Crying is just one way to express your emotions e.g. sadness, shock and confusion. BUT it is NOT the only way. Just aim to let it out in your own way truthfully & try not to replace anything you may feel with something else. 


I hope this blog post helps anyone who may be going through a tough time (you may not know consciously why). Please remember however small or trivial it may seem, you are worth the time to allow yourselves ..... to let it out. 


























Sunday, 31 May 2015

The Battle of NEUROSCIENCE against INTUITION



FREE WILL: MADE SIMPLE? 




What is free will? It's the impossible questioned asked, debated and researched by many in the social science fields. 


To date there still is no universally agreed decision; ironically we may develop flying cars or even a pill to reverse ageing before we will be anywhere near to finding the real answer to the possible illusion of FREE WILL.





PHILOSOPHY: oh how I had a love/hate relationship with it. Initially, I really did think WHY! However, after being forced to study a module, I realised that a lot of science has emerged from PHILOSOPHY and it's not without it's own merits. 

I have tried to break it down as simply as possible. 




NEUROSCIENTISTS firmly are COMPATIBALIST SUPPORTERS; however, though they give insight into the superficial brain level activity of FW, it is not without its limitations & issues. 


PUT SIMPLY

Neuroscientists argue classically that people can volitionally be willed to an act, but still have the ILLUSION of being FREE.

 


I was a strong supporter of Neuroscience, enjoying hard, solid and concrete facts of life, initially believing that our choices are pre-determined. BUT...



I OPENED MY EYES a bit more & did not just rely on fancy brain scans & numbers. For instance, culture & personality can impact the debated degree to which FW appears to be an illusion. 


Brain area activation for moral reasoning increases during highly emotional scenarios. Studies also show that individual FW perception depends on the context.




NO ONE ANSWER is therefore suffice in science, but based on my research I do lean towards the notion that FREE WILL is NOT an ILLUSION, if a person actively chooses so. 






PUT SIMPLY 

It doesn’t matter if you subscribe to theology-based, scientific or a lay-person understanding of FW.  I believe that how we feel intuitively that ‘our decisions can be our own’ matches up with the true nature of FW. 









Thursday, 30 April 2015

THE CONTRACEPTIVE PILL: GOOD, BAD & UGLY

 A Hormonal Illusion of FREEDOM & AUTONOMY. 

 


Trends in society to be conscious of choices made daily from ingesting and exposing or bodies to the “organic” & “free range “cult followers" stresses current knowledge and understanding to TREAT your body like a TEMPLE, or at least try to. 

 

BUT it is not clearly defined when it comes to the “Contraceptive Pill”; we tend to turn a blind eye when  reducing artificial consumptions of hormones for lifestyle convenience.

 




Let's be frank, when it comes modern society sexual habits, society norms and rules are constantly warping.  From being married to one person for a lifetime to having multiple relationships and connections.

 

Uhem, a polite way of saying friends with benefits or physical long-term relationships, with the freedom to opt out of bearing a child.  

 

 

It is not as simple as thinking that the PILL just has simple possible side effects from blood clot to simple emotional changes. It may in fact be shaping your character, personality and choices in daily life! 




 

FEMALES can faint whilst ovulating/period transition. Some mainly just take the PILL from a young age for reducing period pain, lethargy and to improve their lifestyle in general, and especially to deal with the multiple factors of the modern day world. 

 

 

STILL! 

What are the Psychological, Neurological & Philosophical issues that CURRENT science suggests?

 

 

In reality NEW RESEARCH & SCIENCE argues the possibility that in fact PUMPING ARTIFICIAL HORMONES  or “THE PILL may be a contributing factor to trigger the increasing number of mental disorders e.g. depression.

 


Neuroscience supports the notion that pumping any drugs or hormones into your body persistently over a long time will change the composition of your cells and, in essence, can be a TICKING TIME BOMB!



Society in general accepts the side effects of THE PILL as the NORM, and this results in many females dismissing the symptoms they may feel due to SOCIETAL EXPECTATIONS whilst on/withdrawing from the pill as NORMAL.

 



We don't want unwanted pregnancies, especially unplanned teen pregnancies. 

As a society, we need an effective and realistic solution. As with a lot of medicine & politics, sometimes the things promoted  to us are not always the best solution to the problem.

 

 

Evolution determines the hormonal attraction that naturally occurs e.g. studies support the notion that during ovulation preference for masculine & genetically different males dominates, whilst males tend to find naturally ovulating females more attractive than ones that don’t! 

 


 

THE PILL = A Permanent change in biology? Or permanent changes in development & personality, especially in developing females? 

 

 

 

From the 1960s humans reached a pinnacle point, where autonomy and sense of freedom was instilled by THE PILL and was being promoted as the new trend. Females arguably were LIBERATED and less TRAPPED SOCIALLY. 


NB: have you ever dated the wrong guy? ... mmmm well, technically, you could say "IT WAS NOT ME, IT WAS THE PILL, SORRY!" 

 

 

 

HOWEVER, new science would argue that it can also somewhat trap or PER-DETERMINE partner choice. 

So, when taking the “PILL” its artificial hormones would impact your natural choice to perhaps a less attractive partner!

 

 

 

SIDE EFFECTS that are most concerning, however, are the mental implications from feeling low to developing DEPRESSION.  

 

The Philosophical considerations behind the PILL of POLITICS & SCIENCE really should be considered alongside neuroscience and psychology. Once introduced to THE PILL, are our actions more WILLED rather than FREE, from our partner choices to daily life?



 

THE PILL may offer sexual freedom, perhaps better skin, hair, breast size or weight! Or perhaps the opposite! 

 

 BUT the SIDE EFFECTS start first within your biological networks (psychologically) & then, over time, can carry on to PHYSICAL DEFECTS, ranging from impacting nutritional abilities to actually reducing BONE DENSITY.  

 

 

 

The PILL may not be ADDICTIVE, but in essence there are many cases of females returning to the PILL after WITHDRAWING to avoid the SIDE EFFECTS, regardless of the implications.

 

 

One could argue that some PHYSICAL effects, such as HAIR LOSS, BLOATED GUT etc, are aesthetic that should return after a period of time; but this has PSYCHOLOGICAL implications on females after prolonged experience of these SIDE EFFECTS.

 

 

HAIR LOSS, THINNING & REDUCTION is VERY COMMON. It can happen WHILST taking/withdrawing from THE PILL. 

 

Like ANY DRUG, a person's individual reaction & recovery is UNKNOWN. 

 



LOSS of SLEEP draws parallels with SUBSTANCE ABUSE - the recovery can be from 1 month to perhaps 2 years! 



 

Once females been taking the PILL for SEVERAL YEARS, they keep changing or go through menopause. At this point it's most likely for females to feel the biggest amount/effect of SIDE EFFECTS.

 

NEUROSCIENCE's notion of UP & DOWN regulation of your body/brain cells, supports the fact that THE PILL is not a sustainable lifestyle! 

 

 

 

So taking ANY FORM of contraceptive  which is pumping in artificial hormones WILL IMPACT your BIOLOGY, and this WILL CAUSE SIDE EFFECTS that may be experienced for 1yrs+ before your body can normalise.

 

 

This BLOG POST does not advocate we should or should not take ANY FORM of CONTRACEPTIVE that plays with our hormones. 

 

BUT it does highlight the CONSIDERATIONS before you decide to join the daily PILL POPPING culture.

 

 

PUT SIMPLY: 

 

There is more to the contraceptive pills than simply worrying about BLOOD CLOTS. 

 

The SIDE EFFECTS may not be instant; but, in essence, they are arguably still a significant factor when considering a female's MENTAL HEALTH and DEVELOPMENT.